c, d, e
r, a, b
2
Yes. Each vertex has at most two children.
a, c, d
{ r, c, d, e }, { a, b }.
Yes. There are two perfectly good explanations:
The first is simpler, but the second actually provides you with the bipartition.
The tree in question 1.
Given the spanning tree above the fundamental circuits are: C(dc) = abdca, C(ea) = abea, C(bf) = abfca.
There are three fundamental circuits above, these can be combined in 4 ways (C(dc) ⊕ C(ea), C(dc) ⊕ C(bf), C(bf) ⊕ C(ea), C(dc) ⊕ C(bf) ⊕ C(ea) to give three more, for a total of 7.
G1 | G2 | G3 |
G1 ⊕ G2 is given in part a, G1 ⊕ G3 =
Take the mapping from G1 ⊕ G2 to
G1 ⊕ G3 given by
a -> a, b -> c, c -> b, d -> d;
or
a -> d, b -> b, c -> c, d -> a.
No. It is easy to come up with a counterexample.